Search for: All records

Monitoring diseases within tree canopies is challenging due to their inaccessibility and the complexity of canopy ecosystems. Here, we explore the potential of stemflow sampling as a novel, ground-based method for detecting and monitoring canopy-associated pathogens. In a case study focused on Litylenchus crenatae ssp. mccannii (LCM), the nematode associated with Beech Leaf Disease (BLD), we collected stemflow samples from 18 Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. (American beech) trees across 12 storm events. eDNA assays detected LCM presence in 7 of those storms, with quantitative PCR-derived gene concentrations ranging from 80 to 158,000 copies mL−1. Higher detections and concentrations coincided with leaf senescence and bud formation periods, and they correlated conditionally with event rainfall amount and pre-storm changes in relative humidity. Although based on a single site and season, these findings demonstrate the potential for stemflow sampling to capture a pathogen’s eDNA (i.e., canopy distress signals) at ground level. This method could complement traditional monitoring, offering another affordable, non-invasive tool for pathogen detection. Additional validation, particularly regarding live versus dead organisms and across varied site conditions, will be essential to evaluate the breadth of value stemflow eDNA offers for canopy disease management and ecological research. 

As watersheds are complex systems that are difficult to directly study, the streams that drain them are often sampled to search for watershed “signals.” These signals include the presence and/or abundance of isotopes, types of sediment, organisms (including pathogens), chemical compounds associated with ephemeral biogeochemical processes or anthropogenic impacts, and so on. Just like watersheds can send signals via the streams that drain from them, we present a conceptual analysis that suggests plant canopies (equally complex and hard-to-study systems) may send similar signals via the precipitation that drains down their stems (stemflow). For large, tall, hard-to-access tree canopies, this portion of precipitation may be modest, often <2%; however, stemflow waters, like stream waters, scour a large drainage network which may allow stemflow to pick up various signals from various processes within and surrounding canopies. This paper discusses some of the signals that the canopy environment may impart to stemflow and their relevance to our understanding of vegetated ecosystems. Being a conceptual analysis, some examples have been observed; most are hypothetical. These include signals from on-canopy biogeochemical processes, seasonal epi-faunal activities, pathogenic impacts, and the physiological activities of the canopy itself. Given stemflow's currently limited empirical hydrological, ecological and biogeochemical relevance to date (mostly due to its modest fraction in most forest water cycles), future work on the possible “signals in stemflow” may also motivate more natural scientists and, perhaps some applied researchers, to rigorously monitor this oft-ignored water flux.